Legal Opinion

Boyce v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 17, 1981No. 79 C 531PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEAHER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action are nine Deputy United States Marshals who claim entitlement to retroactive promotion and pay in accordance with the terms of a teletype dated June 16, 1972, sent to United States Marshals by a personnel officer of the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”). As discussed more fully below, the terms of promotion as set forth in the teletype were impermissible under applicable law and regulations, and the personnel officer’s erroneous authorization to promote plaintiffs more rapidly than would otherwise be possible was not…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paulson v. County of PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Mid-South Music Corp. v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  3. Blassingame v. Secretary of the NavyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  4. Hayes v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API