Legal Opinion
Handy v. City of New Rochelle
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 28, 2016No. 14-cv-01428 (NSR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*301OPINION & ORDER
NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Dale P. Handy (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action against defendants The City of New Rochelle (the “City”), Jason Lord (“Lord”), Deborah Landry (“Landry”) and Deborah Pritchett (“Pritchett”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for violations of her rights under the Fail-Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq, the Fourth Amendment, and the Fourteenth Amendment. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO FILE A RULE 56.1 STATEMENT
Local…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaminsky v. SchriroDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Ciccaglione v. New York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Rosa v. Pathstone CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Vasquez v. YadaliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020