Legal Opinion
Smith v. Hildenbrand
New York Court of Common Pleas
Decided December 23, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Eleventh district court. Action by Ada F. Parsons Smith against William Hildenbrand. From a judgment rendered on a verdict in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.
The action was brought to recover upon the following written instrument:
“It is agreed that the publishers will not be held responsible for any agreement, promise of cuts, etc., not expressed on this contract in writing.
“The A. F. Parsons Publishing Company.
“$10.00. New York, Aug. 14, 1894.
“You are hereby authorized to deliver 10 copies of ‘New York, 1894,’ bound in embossed pamphlet covers, for which I will pay you, or order, the sum of ten dollars upon delivery of same. An editorial review of our business to appear in the publication. Name, W. Hildenbrand,
“Address, 1 Broadway.
“Remarks: To…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Routledge v. . Worthington Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Universal Fashion Co. v. SkinnerNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- Blackmar v. . ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co. v. HartungNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
- Estelle v. DinsbeerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeVita v. PianisaniAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
- Mulford v. Torrey Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Pelgram v. EhrenzweigAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
- Jones v. Bankers' Trust Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1916