Legal Opinion

Kimco Leasing Co. v. Lake Hortonia Properties

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 27, 1993No. 92-519PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Defendants Lake Hortonia Properties d/b/a The New You Fitness Center and its guarantors appeal from a judgment for $33,987.61, plus costs and attorney’s fees, in favor of plaintiff Kimco Leasing Company, which had sued to recover monies due under the terms of an equipment lease agreement. In defense, defendants asserted that plaintiff had breached implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) because the equipment was defective. The court held that plaintiff was not the seller of the equipment, but rather the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thompson Farms v. CORNO FEED PRODUCTS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. All-States Leasing Co. v. OchsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. All-States Leasing Company v. BassIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Swanson v. Wabash CollegeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. CIT Financial Services, Inc. v. GottCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Springfield Hydroelectric Co. v. CoppSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. Estate of Emil Kuhling by Richard W. Kuhling v. Taylor GlazeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. RLI Insurance v. KlonskyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2011
  4. Lewis v. Bellows Falls Congregation of Jehovah's WitnessesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2017
  5. Stowe Highlands Resort PUD to PRD ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API