Legal Opinion

CIT Financial Services, Inc. v. Gott

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 25, 1980No. 50,644PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spencer, J.:

In four actions consolidated for jury trial and on appeal, CIT Financial Services, Inc., of Kansas (hereinafter plaintiff or CIT) seeks to recover amounts allegedly due and owing under certain written “leases” of copying equipment. After all of the evidence had been presented, the trial court sustained plaintiff’s motion for directed verdicts in its favor and entered judgment in each case accordingly. Defendants have specified six issues on appeal, all of which are included in the proposition of whether the trial court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for directed verdicts.

Plai…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Highland Lumber Co., Inc. v. KnudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Gerchberg Ex Rel. Gerchberg v. LoneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Care Display, Inc. v. Didde-Glaser, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Atlas Industries, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Barbara Oil Co. v. Kansas Gas Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Hepler State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. Agristor Leasing v. Gene E.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
  4. Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. Frank MacKey Frank MacKey Jr. And Stephen MacKey D/B/A Frank MacKey & Sons v. John P. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API