Legal Opinion
RLI Insurance v. Klonsky
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided February 11, 2011No. Case 2:09-cv-157PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
WILLIAM K. SESSIONS III, District Judge.
Plaintiff RLI Insurance Company (“RLI”) seeks a judicial determination of its rights and responsibilities under a policy of personal umbrella liability insurance issued to Defendants Arthur and Jane Klonsky. The Klonskys are responsible for injuries sustained by Defendant Maria Rosatone in an automobile accident in 2008. Rosatone filed a claim with RLI under the Klonskys’ policy. RLI denied coverage on the ground that the policy was void because Arthur Klonsky had made material misrepresentations about the Klonskys’ motor vehicle…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wilson v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Curley v. AMR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Inn-One Home, LLC v. Colony Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2021
- Rivera v. TransUnionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025