Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Hartley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1969No. 44760PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment denying plaintiff’s motion for new trial. The motion was based solely on the general grounds. Thus, the only query is whether the evidence supported the verdict. Southern R. Co. v. Adams, 14 Ga. App. 366 (80 SE 912); Brown v. Bank of Cumming, 144 Ga. 655 (87 SE 887). And see the host of annotations in Code § 70-202, catchwords “General Grounds,” “Approval,” etc. There is in the transcript evidence which if believed by the jury was quite sufficient to have authorized the verdict. It is, of course, of no moment that the evidence would also have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. Brown v. Bank of CummingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gordon v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Patterson v. Duron Paints of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. General Insurance Services, Inc. v. MarcolaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Brookshire v. J. P. Stevens Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Jackson v. RodriquezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API