Legal Opinion

Brown v. Bank of Cumming

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Edwards. Eorsyth superior court. December 28, 1914.

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Curiam.

The holder of a promissory note brought suit against the maker and indorser thereof. The indorser filed his answer, and pleaded non est factum as to the indorsement. The jury returned a verdict against him and the maker for the principal and interest. He moved for a new trial, on the general ground's, and because the court erred in admitting in evidence the note sued upon, over his objection that his signature and indorsement had not been sufficiently proved to authorize its admission in evidence, The motion was overruled, and he excepted.

Held: (a) The testimony as to the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniels v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Dorris v. Farmers & Merchants BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Security Development & Investment Co. v. Ben O'Callaghan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Security Development & Investment Co. v. Ben O'Callaghan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API