Legal Opinion

Prange v. City of Marion

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 2, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bristow

Appellant, C. A. Frange and one George A. Wallace, who does not appeal, as plaintiffs, filed their complaint, in chancery, against the City of Marion, Illinois, for an accounting, and to recover several amounts claimed due appellant from said city. The claim is based upon nonpayment of special improvement bonds issued by said city, for a local improvement, called, “Sidewalk District No. 4.”

Appellant filed counts one and three which charge the same matter, except that count three is to recover on bonds under the seventh instalment of the improvement. Questions for consideration in this appeal…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McGovern v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. The People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Barnes v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorin v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  2. Golconda Fire Protection District v. County of HumboldtNevada Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API