Capital Care Network of Toledo v. Dept. of Health (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO'Donnell, J.
*1211*363{¶ 1} This matter raises important issues that impact constitutional rights. The case has been thoroughly briefed, well argued, and presents single subject and due process challenges to provisions the legislature enacted as part of 2013 Am.Sub.H.B. No. 59 ("H.B. 59"), a biennial budget bill, which arguably impede rights guaranteed to women as declared by the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade , 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973).
{¶ 2} But in the last analysis, this appeal involves a policy decision made by the legislative department of government in vesting the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Women's Medical Professional Corporation Martin Haskell, M.D. v. J. Nick Baird, M.D., Director of Ohio Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Browne v. Artex Oil Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Biglin v. S (In re Black Fork Wind Energy, L. L.C.)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Scott Fetzer Co. v. Am. Home Assur. Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- City of Seven Hills v. McKernan, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.