Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO'Donnell, J.
*158 {¶ 1} The challenges originally asserted by Preterm-Cleveland, Inc., in this case concern whether 2013 Am.Sub.H.B. No. 59 (''H.B. 59''), a biennial budget bill, violates the Single Subject Clause of Article II, Section 15(D) of the Ohio Constitution because provisions enacted or amended as part of the bill are allegedly unrelated to the state budget; however, the predicate issue before us concerns whether Preterm-Cleveland, Inc., has standing to raise the alleged violations and whether it can seek severance of provisions in the bill that did not injure it.
{¶ 2} After review, we conclude that…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. Columbus (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Ohioans for Concealed Carry v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Siliko v. Miami Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Collins v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Eric Petroleum Corp. v. VendelOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.