Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. . Bland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 10, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Motion for certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, 0. J.

Tbis cause was tried and judgment entered at April Term, 1914, of Graven-. Tbe plaintiff appealed, but did not perfect bis appeal, and at tbe call of tbe district at tbe Fall Term of tbis Court tbe defendant docketed tbe required certificate and moved under Eule 17 to dismiss, wbicb was allowed. Thereafter, at tbe November Term of tbe court below tbe plaintiff filed a petition for a new trial for newly discovered evidence. •

His Honor properly beld tbat be bad no jurisdiction to entertain tbe motion. Tbe case was terminated by tbe final judgment at tbe April Term of Craven, unless…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Avery v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Black v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Smith v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Godfrey v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Allen v. . GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API