Legal Opinion

United States v. Real Property Located at 24124 Lemay Street

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 15, 1994No. CV 90-5923-RSWL (Sx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEW, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

After the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Austin v. United States, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2801, 125 L.Ed.2d 488 (1993), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded this case for a determination of whether forfeiture of the Defendant Property constituted an excessive fine in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The parties submitted arguments regarding the excessiveness issue and the Court took this matter under submission. After carefully considering the arguments submitted and reviewing the various approaches of several courts, this Court finds that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Real Property Located in El Dorado County at 6380 Little Canyon RoadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. People ex rel. Waller v. 1989 Ford F350 TruckIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Aravanis v. Somerset CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. United States v. Certain Real Property Located At 11869 Westshore Drive, Putnam Township, Livingston County, Michigan, Together With All Of Its Fixtures, Improvements And Appurtenances, Kathryn DuprieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Quinones-Ruiz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API