Legal Opinion
Cater v. Sunshine Valley Conservancy Dist.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1928No. 3357PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
Chapter 45, Laws of 1927, provides for the organization of conservancy districts, and is of state-wide application, except for subsection 12 of section 202, which is as follows :
“No district formed under the provision of chapter 140, Laws of New Mexico 1923, or formed under the provisions of this act, for the protection and conservation of property in the Rio Grande Valley, shall include any lands south of the Elephant Butte dam, or in or north of the county of Santa Fe, provided that any district formed under said chapter 140, Laws of New Mexico, 1923, shall…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Canavan v. CanavanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
- In Re Proposed Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- Friday v. Santa Fe Central Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Arch Hurley Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Albuquerque v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Hamilton v. Arch Hurley Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Burns v. HeronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932