Legal Opinion
Bache & Co. v. Clay
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 29, 1973No. Civ. 72-625PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
In this case the Plaintiff, Bache & Co., sues the Defendants, Henry Clay and wife, with reference to a stock-brokerage joint trading account said Defendants carried with Plaintiff and which involved ■ stock of Diversified Medical Investments Company (DMIC). Plaintiff claims that there is a $13,162.-50 balance due and owing it on Defendants’ joint account as a result of stock' transactions in said stock made by Plaintiff as agent of Defendants and for their benefit. Defendants deny Plaintiff’s assertions and by counterclaim against Plaintiff assert that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Galigher v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,239, 1972 Trade Cases P 73,967 Norman L. Harwell v. Growth Programs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Nicholson v. ThixtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Harwell v. Growth Programs, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Master Commodities, Inc. v. Texas Cattle Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- J. R. Fulton, D/B/A J. R. Fulton & Company v. L & N Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- J. R. Fulton, D/B/A J. R. Fulton & Company v. L & N Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Master Commodities, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Texas Cattle Management Co., Cattle Resources Partnership-1974, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff and Third Party v. Rufenacht, Bromagen & Hertz, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978