Legal Opinion

Vitaphone Corp. v. Electrical Research Products, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 21, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, Chief Justice:

The question this court is required to decide is one of law, viz., whether the arbitration covenant and/or statute relied on by the respondent constitute a bar 'to the action instituted in this court by the complainant. There are no questions of fact now involved and it is, therefore, unnecessary to make further reference to the bill of complaint, or state at greater length than I have, the allegations of the plea.

The respondent contends that the arbitration covenant involved in this case, entered into in another State, should be recognized by this court, and be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API