Legal Opinion

State v. Fischer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The appellant makes three assignments of error:(1) The court erred in refusing to receive evidence offered by the defendant.(2) The court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal.(3) The court erred in denying defendant’s motions after verdict to have the verdict of the jury set aside and for a judgment of acquittal, or a new trial.

Under these assignments, the appellant argues all the contentions urged in the trial court and as indicated in his motions after verdict, with the exception that no contention is made here that the court erred in instructing the jury,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clemens v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. FrickeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Lam Yee v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Imperio v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gauthier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. FriesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. CrabtreeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gronowicz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API