Legal Opinion
Vicino v. Maryland
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 8, 2013No. Civil No. JKB-12-2790PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge.
Megan E. Vicino (“Plaintiff’) brought this suit against the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”) alleging employment discrimination on the basis of sex and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Plaintiff also brought this suit against her former supervisor David Powell (“Powell”) to recover damages stemming from his alleged employment discrimination on the basis of sex. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aly v. United States Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Miller v. BrightKey, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Squire v. FedEx Freight, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020