Legal Opinion

Clawson Et Ux v. Prouty Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment adverse to them which the Circuit Court for Columbia County entered in an ejectment action which the plaintiffs, husband and wife, instituted against the defendants, who also are husband and wife. The cause was tried by the judge without a jury and rendition of the judgment was preceded by the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiffs-appellants present only one assignment of error; it reads:

“The trial court erred in entering judgment for Bespondents in that such judgment is not supported either by evidence or by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Ladd & Tilton v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Eagle Cliff Fishing Co. v. McGowanOregon Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Westwood Construction Co. v. Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Wall v. StinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Aguirre v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Lincoln Loan Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Keeney v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API