M. F. Hickey Co. v. Imperial Realty Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
We find that the court correctly determined that plaintiff had a lien against the fee interest in the sum of $6,704.08. The previous relationship of the principals of the corporate landlord and tenant, the clear purpose of the lease, the authorization to build, the agreement of the landlord to contribute $500,000 toward the cost of the structure and the beneficial interest accruing to the landlord, unlike the facts in Mitchell & Son v. Blessington (N. Y. L. J., March 16, 1964, p. 15, col. 4, affd. 24 A D 2d 934), all support the finding that the landlord consented to the work (Burkitt v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burkitt v. . HarperNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Jones v. . MenkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Gescheidt & Co. v. Bowery Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Gescheidt Company, Inc. v. Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ackoff-Ortega v. Windswept Pacific Entertainment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Bell v. TollefsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- In re the Estate of YoungNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- W.J. Northridge Construction Corp. v. Star Industries, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001