Legal Opinion

Gescheidt & Co. v. Bowery Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The lease from defendant bank to defendant Hutchison approved certain specified alterations, but provided that no further structural changes should be made without the bank’s consent. Under the circumstances the trial court was justified upon the proof adduced in awarding plaintiff a mechanic’s lien for the original work, and in refusing to award a mechanic’s *267lien for the additional alterations ordered by Hutchison. However, credit should have been given to the bank for the partial payments made by Hutchison. Where neither the debtor nor- the creditor elects to apply a payment to one of two…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lorber v. Eskof Real Estate, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Osborne v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  3. City of New York v. Idlewild Beach Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943
  4. FERRARA, ANGELO A. v. PEACHES CAFE LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. M. F. Hickey Co. v. Imperial Realty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API