Osborn v. Ekpsz, LLC
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
This is an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).1 One month after the plaintiffs moved for leave to file a second amended complaint, the defendant moved for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), (Docket Entry No. 21), and responded to the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend, (Docket Entry No. 22). The motion for judgment on the pleadings argued that the content of the debt-collection letter refuted the plaintiffs’ claims. (Docket Entry No. 21, at 3-8). The response to the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Cuvillier v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Douyon v. NY Medical Health Care, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Humes v. LVNV Funding, L.L.C. (In re Humes)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013
- McWilliams v. Advanced Recovery Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2016
- Hernandez v. GuglielmoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.