Legal Opinion

People v. Ring

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 156, Calendar No. 37,686PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.

Defendant, the proprietor, and operator of a nudist colony, described as the Sun Sports League camp, was convicted of a violation of section 335, of the penal code, Act No. 328, Pub. Acts 1931.

The section reads:

“Any man or woman, not being married to each other, who shall lewdly and lasciviously associate and cohabit together, and any man or woman, married or unmarried, who shall be guilty of open and gross lewdness and lascivious behavior, or who shall designedly make any open or indecent or obscene exposure of his or her person, or of the person of another, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Brent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. State v. MillardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  5. People v. WendlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. MacPhersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. People v. PankninMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. People v. VronkoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API