Legal Opinion

People v. Newton

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 2007No. G037968PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, the People of the State of California, purports to appeal from an order consolidating four counts of an information into a single count. This is not an appealable order. But, as we advised the parties, we will treat the appeal as a petition for a writ of mandate as plaintiff lacks an adequate remedy at law. (See Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 401 [197 Cal.Rptr. 843, 673 P.2d 720]; Rogers v. Municipal Court (1988) 197 Cal.App.3d 1314, 1317 [243 Cal.Rptr. 530].)

Defendant Stephen Robert Newton allegedly was involved in a hit-and-run accident.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wilkoff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Barner v. LeedsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. StoneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. ArzabalaColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. People v. CallesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. DenardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API