Legal Opinion

Bladine v. Bladine

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 29, 1924No. 23,747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment granting plaintiff a divorce on the ground of cruelty and awarding her permanent alimony.

After the judgment was entered, defendant moved to vacate or modify the same, or for a new trial because of (a) errors occurring at the trial, and (b) because the judgment is contrary to the law *297under section 7128, G. S. 1913, and to the evidence. No erroneous rulings at the trial were specified. The errors assigned in this court are: “First, that the granting of a divorce is not supported by the evidence; Second, that should the granting of the divorce be sustained the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nye v. KahlowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Prosser v. ManleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carl v. DetoffolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  3. Starks v. StarksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Bank of Dakota County v. GarvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Johnson v. MadsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API