Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Madson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1927No. 25,985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

The defendants Madson are husband and wife, and Mrs. Madson is a daughter of the plaintiff. The other parties named as defendants are not parties to this appeal nor concerned in the matters in controversy; and the term defendant as usecl herein will designate defendant Martin A. Madson.

In April, 1921, defendant purchased a house and lot in the city of Minneapolis subject to a mortgage of $2,500, and he and his wife thereafter occupied it as their home. Plaintiff furnished him $1,500 toward making .the purchase. A week or two later plaintiff and defendant executed a contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bladine v. BladineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Bank of Dakota County v. GarvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wallner v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Warner Hardware Co. v. ShimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API