H. D. Forbes & Bro. v. Porter

I. This is a motion to dismiss the appeal because the appeal bond does not “ recite and sufficiently identify ” the judgment appealed from.

From the transcript of the record ñled September 3, 1886, it appears that according to the praecipe, summons ad respondendum, and declaration and the affidavit, bond, writ and other proceedings in attachment, the appellees sued Henry D. Forbes and Edward E. Forbes, partners and merchants, trading in Marion county, Florida, under the *48firm name of H. D. Eorbes & Bro.. in assumpsit, damages $1,350. The summons ad respondendum was issued and served March 12th,…