Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Relf

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Yolusia county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Raney

Appellees, who were complainants below, moved to vacate the supersedeas in this cause. The supersedeas 'bond fails to identify with certainty the decree appealed from. It not only does not identify the decree appealed from, but it also fails to identify with certainty the cause in which the decree was rendered. The decree, as set forth in the transcript before us, shows both by the title of the case, as stated, and by the context of the decree, that John S. Relf is a complainant as administrator of the estate of Sam’l IT. Williams, yet in the bond he is not so represented to the exclusion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. FerrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1881
  2. New Orleans Insurance Company v. Albro CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. H. D. Forbes & Bro. v. PorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McMichael v. Eckman & VestburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API