Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Dexter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1878PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Ionia. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The question in this case is whether a garnishee proceeding has been discontinued by a failure of the plaintiffs to appear on the return of a summons to show cause.

The principal suit was by Tower & Mills against Zachariah York, and William W. and Harvey E. Johnson were garnished as debtors of York. The garnishee summons was issued August 22, 1876, returnable August 28, 1876. The garnishees appeared and made disclosure, and thereupon, in pursuance of the statute, the proceedings were continued without day. September 11, 1876, the justice issued a summons, returnable September 18, 1876,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. School District No. 4 v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. State ex rel. Crawford v. EberlyNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Tabor v. Van VrankenMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Scott v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Chamberlain v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API