Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Wallace

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1913No. Docket No. 11PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Garnishment proceedings by Alvinzie H. Chamberlain against Carthagenia Wallace. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

The garnishee defendant, against whom a judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, has brought the case here for review upon writ of error without settling a bill of exceptions, relying entirely upon the record to show that she is entitled to a reversal. The principal defendant, William E. Wallace, her husband, was a druggist in Detroit and,, together with another defendant, was sued by plaintiff for injuries he sustained because of the mistake of a drug clerk in filling a prescription for him at defendant’s place of business. The trial resulted in a *610judgment against Wallace for $2,000 on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hebel v. Amazon InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Ettelsohn v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Johnson v. DexterMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Wellover v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Keppel v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walden v. Crego's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lafayette Benevolent Society v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API