Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crawford v. Eberly

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Order to show cause why an attachment should not issue against respondents for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell,' J.

In July, 1881, the relator applied to this court for a *617writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, as county clerk of Stanton county, to deliver to him a county warrant for the sum of $88.00, drawn in favor of Mary Horacek, but alleged to have been assigned to the relator. An alternative writ was granted, to which the defendant filed an answer stating in substance that he had been garnished as county clerk in an action pending in the district court of Stanton county, wherein D. Crowell was plaintiff, and Waelaw Horacek and others were defendants. The cause was continued from time to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. Root ex rel. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  2. Merwin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. City of Chicago v. HasleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. School District No. 4 v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Wallace v. LawyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Sherman v. ShobeTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State ex rel. Summerfield v. TylerWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Switzer v. City of WellingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Brumbaugh v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Clark v. Board of Com'rs of Osage CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API