Legal Opinion

Knoohuizen v. Nicholl

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 16, 1924No. 2201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

Knoohuizen & Byrd sued Nicholl in the county court of Hale county, to recover upon a .note dated March 2, 1921, in the principal sum of $685, and providing for interest at 10 per cent, and 10 per cent, attorneys’ fees. The defendant filed his plea •of privilege, which was sustained, and the case was transferred to the county court of Swisher county. Nicholl answered, alleging in substance that at the time of the execution of the note and long prior thereto and for several months thereafter, he was in the employ of plaintiffs, engaged in soliciting and writing insurance for them; that about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. RayzorTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. MathewsTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Merchants' Reciprocal Underwriters of Dallas v. First Nat. Bank of CanadianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Rahe v. YettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Dalby v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peters v. Hubb Diggs Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Commercial Investment Trust, Inc. v. SmartTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Griffith v. Lawrence Systems, Inc. of Mass. (In Re Hipp, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1987
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Fuqua v. MapesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API