Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. Mathews
Texas Supreme Court
Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Coleman County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yantis
- This case is before us on certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District. It presents the question whether the amount in controversy is in excess of one thousand dollars, and that, therefore, the County Court in which the case was tried had no jurisdiction thereof. To the certificate of the Court of Civil Appeals there is attached, and made a part thereof, the plaintiffs’ first amended original petition on which the case was tried in the County Court. Both the certificate and said petition are copied herein, and are as follows:
“This case is pending in the Court of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pecos & North Texas Railway Co. v. Canyon Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
- Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. RayzorTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. AddisonTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McDaniel v. National Steam Laundry Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. SealeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. KishiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- City of San Antonio v. PfeifferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- West Lumber Co. v. HendersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.