Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Armstrong & Armstrong

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1937No. 4170PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.

The appellant was plaintiff below and will be so referred to in this opinion. The appellees Armstrong & Armstrong will be referred to as the employers; the appellee United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as insurer; and W-illie Bartlett, deceased, as employee.

The facts alleged by plaintiff include the following: The plaintiff is a physician and surgeon and maintains a hospital. The employers are contractors for the construction of roads, highways, etc. The insurer is a corporation authorized to do business in New Mexico, and had insured the employers, as required by the New…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Burton v. LarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Panasuk's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Noer v. G. W. Jones Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Swift & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Tyler v. Dowell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Leyba v. WhitleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Flores v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API