Legal Opinion

Matoff v. Brinker Restaurant Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 26, 2006No. CV 06-2839 GHK JTLPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceedings: Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second and Fourth Claims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)

KING, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the above-entitled motion. This motion is appropriate for resolution without oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15 (formerly Local Rule 7.11). After carefully considering all pertinent papers, we rule as follows:

The parties are familiar with the facts in the current action. Thus, we will not repeat any facts except as necessary.

I. Introduction and Legal Standard

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Rex v. Chase Home Finance LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
  4. Bradstreet v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Pemberton v. Nationstar Mortg. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API