Legal Opinion

Bruce Ring v. First Interstate Mortgage, Inc. Federal National Mortgage Association

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 28, 1993No. 92-1019PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this housing discrimination case is whether developer Bruce Ring’s complaint states a claim under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-31. The district court granted defendant lenders’ motions to dismiss because Ring failed to allege the elements of a prima facie ease of discrimination. Because the prima facie case is an evidentiary rather than a pleading standard, we reverse.

I

In March 1990, Ring commenced this action in Missouri state court, alleging that defendants First Interstate Mortgage, Inc. (“FIM”), and Federal National Mortgage Association…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  3. Barbara Hager v. Arkansas Dept. of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. Donald Earl Atkinson v. Susan Bohn Phil JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Jerry Wright v. First Student, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API