Oliver v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mb,. Justice McKinney
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a condemnation suit by which the State seeks to acquire certain lands for park purposes belonging to the Olivers. The Olivers defended upon the ground that the act under which the State was proceeding was unconstitutional, and that the State was without auhority to acquire said lands by condemnation. The trial court sustained this latter defense, and dismissed the petition of the State. Upon appeal this Court reversed the trial court, holding that the State had authority to condemn the land, and remanded the case for such further…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Story v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Clark v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. v. OliverTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Akers v. GillentineCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Akers v. GillentineCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Alley v. SchoolfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.