Legal Opinion

Levy v. Kirby

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided October 20, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The bill appeals to the auxiliary jurisdiction of this court, to aid the complainants in securing the testimony of an aged and infirm witness who happens to be a defendant, and the principal one, in the law action in which his testimony is desired to be used. The bill is strictly of the de bene esse type. The examination which it seeks is a general one. If the examination were ordered, it should only be on interrogatories filed and allowed after an opportunity to except.thereto had been af*276forded. If it were not so, the complainants, who have sued Kirby at law, would be enabled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winter v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Terry v. StullCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  3. Loft, Inc. v. GuthCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
  4. Levy v. Frederick M. Kirby & Fremkir Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
  5. Richter v. JeromeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Denning v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1948
  2. Quill v. CarpenterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API