Quill v. Carpenter
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
In Levy v. Kirby, 9 W. W. Harr. (39 Del.) 109, 192 A. 696, and Levy v. Kirby, 22 Del. Ch. —, 196 A. 816, 817, the Superior Court and the Court of Chancery, respectively, considered the rights of one party to take deposition of an adverse party outside of the state, said deposition to be taken de bene esse. In both cases, on the facts there present, it was determined that such depositions could not be taken. In both cases the origin and history of the taking of testimony by deposition was dealt with and will not be here repeated. In Laurel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Winter v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Western Union Teleg. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Wheeler v. BurckhardtOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Union Mortgage Co. v. RocheleauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1931
- Ex parte AlexanderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James Walter Truitt, a Minor, by Howard Truitt, His Next Friend, and Pearl L. Truitt, and Howard Truitt, Individually v. Russell Lowell GainesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Denning v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1948
- James Walter Truitt, a Minor, by Howard Truitt, His Next Friend, and Pearl L. Truitt, and Howard Truitt, Individually v. Russell Lowell GainesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963