Legal Opinion

Sicard v. Ingalls

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1948No. 6 Div. 598-599PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

This is a second appeal in this cause.— Elmore v. Ingalls, 245 Ala. 481, 17 So.2d 674.

After the cause was remanded, the bill was amended by adding appellants Paul Sicard, C. E. Dickey, and others, as additional parties respondent. On former appeal the bill of complaint, omitting its formal parts and prayer for relief, was set out in the opinion rendered by this Court, where we held that the bill was not subject to the demurrer interposed. By reference to that opinion the amendments made after the cause was remanded can be readily understood.

The bill was amended so as to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. SkeggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Shields v. HightowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Elmore v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. First Nat. Bank of Opp v. WiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Allen v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curjel v. AshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Tarvin v. TarvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Smith v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API