Legal Opinion

Allen v. Young

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1928No. 6 Div. 47PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

' The substituted and amended bill in this cause was held subject to demurrer by the trial court, and, on appeal, this court held that the bill contained equity, and was not subject to the demurrer charging a want of equity and other objections to the bill. Stevens v. Hopson et al., 215 Ala. 261, 110 So. .147.

On remandment, the bill was amended in some unessential respects; its equity and prayers remaining unchanged. Respondents again demurred to the bill, and this appeal is from a decree of the trial court overruling the demurrer.

In .that state of the case, the equity of the bill having been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shields v. HightowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Alabama Water Service Co. v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Stevens v. HopsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alexander v. LandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. First Nat. Bank of Opp v. WiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Thomasson v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Brasher v. GraysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Sicard v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API