Legal Opinion

Elmore v. Ingalls

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1944No. 6 Div. 159PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

The appeal is from a decree overruling demurrers to an original bill of complaint seeking to restrain and enjoin the pollution of a stream known as Little Cahaba River, and damages for injuries done to complainant’s property who is a lower riparian owner.

The respective rights of riparian owners of land as to the natural flow of water and use thereof, the rights of owners of upper and lower estates with respect to water courses have often been declared by this Court. McCary v. McLendon et al., 195 Ala. 497, 70 So. 715; Smith et al. v. McElderry, 220 Ala. 342, 124 So. 896;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Clifton Iron Co. v. DyeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Ulbricht v. Eufaula Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Mississippi Mills Co. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Gulf States Steel Co. v. LawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. WadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Crommelin v. FainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Russell Corp. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Beaunit Corporation v. Alabama Power CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1973
  5. Montgomery Limestone Co. v. BeardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API