Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 21, 2007No. Civ. 07-1288 (RHK/AJB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this action, Plaintiff Jamie Gilmore alleges that her former employer, Defendant Northwest Airlines, Inc. (“Northwest”), violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”) when it terminated her employment; Gilmore also asserts a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress arising out of her termination. Northwest now moves for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over Gilmore’s claims. For the reasons set forth below, the Court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Minnesota Transitions Charter SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Edwards v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Spine Imaging MRI, LLC v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Sturge v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. BNSF RailwayDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.