Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Maddox
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), a Pennsylvania corporation, filed suit against James Maddox (“Maddox”), a citizen of Delaware, and J & M Construction and Demolition (“J & M Construction”),1 after Conrail settled a suit brought against it by James F. Tuerk (“Tuerk”), a Conrail employee, who was injured in an area where J & M Construction was removing track and rail pursuant to a contract with Conrail. Although Conrail is the nominal plaintiff, Lloyd’s of London (“Lloyd’s”) is the party pursuing this action, because…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Perma Research & Development Company v. Singer CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- John Blair & Co. v. WaltonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
- United States v. United States Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- Youell v. MaddoxDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Ecolab Inc. v. DuBois Chemicals, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023