Legal Opinion
Perma Research & Development Company v. Singer Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 27, 1970No. 66 Civ. 665PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendant, The Singer Company (“Singer”), for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Plaintiff, Perma Research & Development Company (“Perma”), contends that the motion should be denied both because of the doctrine of “law of the case” and because there are many issues of material fact in dispute.
The complaint, far from a model of clarity, asserts three claims. The first seeks damages of $41,000,000 for breach of a June 1964 contract between the parties, alleging that substantial numbers of an automobile…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Perma Research & Development v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Perma Research & Development Co. v. Singer Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Bloor v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- MacKsey v. EganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.