Legal Opinion
Royal Ins. Co. v. Eggleston
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 1924No. 6 Div. 374PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The complaint as amended, was in two counts, claiming in the first count the valpe of an automobile insured by de fendant against loss from fire, and in the second count for the penalty of 25 per cent, under the statute, by reason of defendant's membership in the S. E. Tariff Association. The complaint was demurred to, and demur-, rer was overruled, but as to this there is no assignment of error.
Answering the complaint defendant filed 12 pleas, 'to all of which demurrers were, filed, except as to the plea of general issue. The court sustained demurrers to pleas 3, 6, 7, and 11, and this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Supreme Commandery of the Knights of the Golden Rule v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Commonwealth v. WetherbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- National Park Bank v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Southern States Fire Ins. v. KronenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. SheaOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- American Ins. Co. v. MillicanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
- Johnson v. Dairyland Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Queen Ins. Co. of America v. Bethel ChapelAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
- Massie v. Washington Fidelity Nat. Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.