United States v. Peebles
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Kelley LaShelle Peebles contends that the ten-month sentence that she received for violating the conditions of her supervised release is unreasonable. Because the district court failed to calculate the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range, we VACATE Peebles’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing.
I. BACKGROUND
Peebles entered a guilty plea to one count of committing bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota on. April 27, 2007. On August 31, she was sentenced to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. BoldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BlackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. KontrolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. TavaresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Michael ThoranCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Millan-IsaacCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. SpeedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.