Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 12, 2011No. 09-3664PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Harold Jones appeals the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions and his sentence. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM Jones’s convictions, but VACATE his sentence and REMAND for resentencing.

I. BACKGROUND

Harold Jones is a podiatrist who served a large, mostly elderly client base in Cleveland, Ohio. On April 9, 2008, a grand jury in United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio indicted Jones with twenty-seven counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, twenty-three counts of healthcare…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Gary R. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Sherry WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Daryl LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. EversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Jennifer RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API