Legal Opinion

Brickman v. Niagara Fruit Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward S. Conway, J.

The plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to CPLB 3213 on the ground that there is no defense to the cause of action alleged in the moving papers.

The summons was accompanied by a notice of motion, supported by an affidavit of the plaintiff, stating that suit was brought to recover a debt in the amount of $7,944 on an account stated between plaintiff and defendant for goods sold defendant by the plaintiff between April 25, 1970 and October 23, 1970; and that since October 23, 1970 there has been no payment on the account, leaving a balance due of $7,944. A copy of the accounts due is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Bailey v. Robinson Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kretschmann v. Board of Education of the Corning Painted Post School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ace Office Cleaning Corp. v. Brodsky, Hopf & Adler, P. C.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  3. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Stern v. Chemical BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  5. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API