Legal Opinion
Kretschmann v. Board of Education of the Corning Painted Post School District
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph W. Latham, J.
The defendant, Stetson-Dale, also known as Stetson-Dale Harza (hereafter referred to as Stetson), moves for dismissal of and/or summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs complaint and codefendants’ cross claims. The plaintiffs cross motion requests permission nunc pro tunc to serve a notice of claim on defendant Stetson.
*536The party moving for summary judgment has the initial burden of setting forth evidentiary facts that establish its cause of action or defense sufficiently to entitle it to judgment as a matter of law. (Harper v Murphy Overhead Doors,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Royal v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Heller v. Hicks Nurseries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Brickman v. Niagara Fruit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- Harper v. Murphy Overhead Doors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2016
- Kretschmann v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Ace Sec. Corp. v. DB Structured Prods., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2016
- C.L. v. County of OneidaNew York Supreme Court, Oneida County · 2024
- Kretschmann v. Board of Education of the Corning Painted Post School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 2001